As I often find, there is a very interesting discussion going on over at the Five Cent Stand blog. This one began as an examination of the role that we assign to the authority of the Church and church leaders. Along the way, it meandered into lines between Protestants and Catholics, how they are blurred, and where they are obsolete. Naturally, views of baptism came up, and that lead to a discussion of salvation.
Two divergent viewpoints materialized, though neither was entrenched or defensive: one is that salvation cannot be lost or else it was never real salvation to begin with, the other was that salvation could be lost and must be 'maintained', (for lack of a better term.)
Here was my contribution to the discussion:
One element perhaps either missing or under-mentioned in this discussion is that salvation does not mean going to heaven. That traps it in the future. We are saved right now. We are being saved right now. We will be saved as we go. But we are clearly meant to live out our salvation right now. Heaven is a byproduct of salvation - not it's goal...
When I say that you are saved right now, what I have in mind is that salvation is not so that you can someday go to heaven. It is so that you can begin serving God right here right now today. That's all that I meant by that.
As for 'losing your salvation' vs. 'never really having been saved,' it's never as cut and dry as any one verse might suggest. However, read Hebrews. I'll say read the whole book because I like keeping context as much as possible, but in particular, check Hebrews 6:4-6. "For it is impossible to restore again to repentance those who have once been enlightened, and have tasted the heavenly gift, and have shared in the Holy Spirit, and have tasted the goodness of the word of God and the powers of the age to come, and then have fallen away, since on their own they are crucifying again the Son of God and are holding him up to contempt."
Now hold steady, what this verse may seem to be suggesting, but it is not, is that you can be saved, then lose your salvation, and if you do you're lost forever. Certainly that is possible, but not necessarily inevitable. What it does seem to say is that it certainly is possible to be saved and then fall away.
I think illustrations from the Old Testament might be illuminating as well. The Israelites wandered in and out of God's favor continually. I know that's a bit of a different thing, but it speaks to the character of God that will not hold on to those who will not willingly be held.
I think of salvation and damnation like this: It's not in one moment that eternity is decided. It is as if a snowball starts on the top of a mountain and begins rolling. The moment of its impetus is the first decision. As it rolls down the hill it gains momentum and builds in size. Can its course be changed? Surely, but the longer it rolls the more difficult that becomes and the greater the size of the intervention that is needed.
Our lives should be snowballs rolling towards Christ. Each day we should gain momentum. This isn't 'works righteousness,' (a very misunderstood concept), but rather a statement that our progress towards Christ is an active one, not a passive one.
It's not a matter of needing to be re-saved every time we sin, it's simply that we need to make sure through repentance and forgiveness that those sins don't alter our course.
What do you think?

3 Cachinnations
I think that your point is very well made. The idea of "Once saved, always saved" is only a problem to fathom if you take that one moment completely out of context with the resto of your life.
If that experience of beginning was the end, you would be like a man who says that he wants to go to the ocean, drives thousands of miles to get there, gets out of his car, looks at it, and then turns around and returns to where he came from, never coming back to it. He never gets in it, tastes its saltiness, rides its waves, feels the coldness of the water. He knew of the ocean, and now he has seen it, but he has still never experienced it.
That's the way I see it, anyway.
Posted on 10/07/2006
That's a tough one, and there's always a lot of debate over those verses. They do see to suggest that there is ability to "lose one's salvation," but then as many have pointed out--the verses don't specifically address whether or not one can "fall away." In speaking of that theorectical possibility, all they really say is that if such a thing could happen, then it is impossible for one to come back to faith. Did that make sense at all?
Anyway, the good news is that the writer of Hebrews did not conceive of such a thing happening among those to whom the letter was addressed (i.e., 6:9). I've always taken a lot of comfort from something that Barth once said about not taking our doubts too seriously because God takes our faith completely serious and makes more of it than we ever could.
Posted on 10/07/2006
Well said, Meg. I would say that acknowledging the theoretical possibility does acknowledge the reality of the possibility of falling away. Though indeed, as is the writer's point of view, the overwhelming reality of salvation trumps that possibility in the community of faith. I add, as I said earlier, that the possibility becomes more remote as salvation strengthens over time. The course of salvation becomes ever surer as the possibility of falling away becomes ever more remote. Yet both of those ends are possible. Good talk.
Posted on 10/07/2006